<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>wizzard</title>
  <link>https://wizzard.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>wizzard - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:35:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>wizzard</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://wizzard.dreamwidth.org/242186.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:35:26 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>One more reason to abandon Apache</title>
  <link>https://wizzard.dreamwidth.org/242186.html</link>
  <description>&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/a381ff35fa4d50a5f7b9f64300dfd98859dee8d0#commitcomment-1819635&quot;&gt;https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/a381ff35fa4d50a5f7b9f64300dfd98859dee8d0#commitcomment-1819635&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Apache does not tolerate deliberate abuse of open standards &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt; Google has already been caught circumventing cookie privacy in Safari. Now Apache will ignore the DNT setting? This &quot;patch&quot; makes one thing perfectly clear: No company or organization can be trusted to ensure the user&apos;s right to privacy. Therefore, laws must be introduced to protect the user from the predatory actions of others. No organization has any right to a user&apos;s private data. However, in most locations, the users do have a right to privacy. Clearly, the only way to gain access to a user&apos;s private data must be through a positive confirmation, or &quot;opt-in&quot;, mechanism. Any violators must face harsh penalties similar to the ridiculous fines imposed on individuals caught sharing files. Let these violators pay $650,000 per violation per user per session and see how long they stay in business.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt; I would like to thank &lt;span style=&apos;white-space: nowrap;&apos;&gt;&lt;a href=&apos;https://www.dreamwidth.org/profile?user=royfielding&apos;&gt;&lt;img src=&apos;https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png&apos; alt=&apos;[profile] &apos; width=&apos;17&apos; height=&apos;17&apos; style=&apos;vertical-align: text-bottom; border: 0; padding-right: 1px;&apos; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&apos;https://www.dreamwidth.org/profile?user=royfielding&apos;&gt;&lt;b&gt;royfielding&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; for providing proof that open source and not-for-profit organizations cannot be trusted, either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=wizzard&amp;ditemid=242186&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://wizzard.dreamwidth.org/242186.html</comments>
  <category>microsoft</category>
  <category>apache</category>
  <category>идиоты</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
